Talk:Criticism of Facebook/Archive 3

"Datr cookie" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Datr cookie. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 14 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Better Business Bureau review outdated
the section on Better Business Bureau review data is outdated (from 2010) and should be updated. Saxygator (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Facebook censored post.png

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Facebook censored post.png

Has info from the WSJ 'Facebook Files' investigation been added?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facebook-files-11631713039 — Preceding unsigned comment added by I am not an ip address (talk • contribs) 17:28, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 25 November 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved per WP:SNOW  (t · c)  buidhe  10:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Criticism of Facebook → Criticism of Meta – Facebook as a company have changed their name to "Meta" hence I propose that this article be renamed to reflect that. Slender (talk) 09:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose I doubt many people would know that there is a company called "Facebook/Meta and most people will just think of the website which is still "Facebook" so I think overall "Facebook" is the WP:COMMONNAME if this deals with both the company and website.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 12:35, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose move. This article includes criticism of both, but is primarily about the website itself and matters related to the website.  O.N.R.  (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose and support a WP:SNOW closure - "Facebook" is still clearly the WP:COMMONNAME and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 23:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The company has had over a decade of history before renaming itself "Meta". Some people don't even know its current name is "Meta". For one thing, "Facebook" is still the established name, and for another, the company renaming itself doesn't affect criticism made before the renamer. J I P  &#124; Talk 01:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose this is primarily about criticism of the app, not the corporate entity. User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 17:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose this is primarily about the criticism of the social network, which understandably gets directed at the company. Most of the criticism of the company is related to the network. Bneu2013 (talk) 19:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Draperdavid. Peer reviewers: Crvazqu, Emilymorse22.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kbmclin01. Peer reviewers: Kbmclin01.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Is the first sentence of the article off topic?
It feels like it's talking more about the impact that criticism has had rather than a summary of the criticism itself, which seems more important. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 22:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Merging Unfollow Everything
Unfollow Everything take down has been covered by reliable sources, but the software is probably not notable for a standalone article yet. Coverage lasted mostly for a few days after the take down. With the exception of this WSJ piece. Could someone look into merging that article to Criticism of Facebook or Facebook? Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Support - I support the merge, you can continue and make a redirect to its section under Criticism of Facebook. DownTownRich (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Support - All of the above --Jamo62 (talk) 13:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment: There is a tag saying this article is too long to read comfortably, so I think a merge should be avoided if possible.
 * Length concerns noted, but 2 sentences shouldn't be burdensome and pruning elsewhere would be more effective. ✅ Klbrain (talk) 09:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at UC Berkeley supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program&#32;during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)