Talk:Criticism of the historical Catholic Church


 * The content was not all copied from the above article, rather much of it was transcluded from other articles, and may have unrelated content. Sandy Georgia  (Talk)

Title written with italic letters
Why is the title written in italic letters? I can't seem to change this. lovkal (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It was transcluding the italic template from Postremo mense, but not anymore because I switched from the #section-h: type template to the #section: type template. The latter only transcludes material placed between tags on the other article, the former transcludes the whole section carte blanche. If no section is given, it transcludes the lead and whatever comes before it, such as the italic title template.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 21:27, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Problematic
This article was created via a problematic split from Criticism of the Catholic Church; see Talk:Criticism of the Catholic Church and the sections above that section. Most of the transclusions may need to be removed, as they appear to have been added with little care as to to reviewing the content to determine if there was actually reliably sourced criticism in the transcluded content. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  04:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * This page was only created after a consensus decided to split the page at Talk:Criticism of the Catholic Church.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 04:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * There was only you & one other person specifically in favour of your proposal. Apart from that, the way you did it, which was not covered in any detail, is very problemmatic. Johnbod (talk) 04:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Query
How exactly do you get "citation needed" tags from January 2019 in an article that wasn't created until April 2019? Mannanan51 (talk) 16:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)