Talk:Crop diversity/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Shearonink (talk · contribs) 07:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I am reviewing this article for possible GA classification. Shearonink (talk) 07:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * Wow. This is really REALLY well-written. Nicely-done. Shearonink (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, thank you! Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * Agroecology is wikilinked as a "further"-article, wikilinked as a term within the text, and also present in the 'See also' section. Per WP:MOS the extra linking needs to be removed from 'See also' and the extra linking at  agroecosystem  also needs to also be removed. Shearonink (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * The following references need adjusting:
 * Ref #7/doi.org requites a subscription
 * Added.
 * I see that another WP editor found a freely-available source. Shearonink (talk) 06:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Ref #17/worldbank.org is dead
 * Seems to be ok now, checked and updated citation. Maybe website was down briefly.
 * http://usc-canada.org/what-we-do/sos/ gives a 404 Result
 * Updated URL.
 * Ref #31/http://www.nbagr.ernet.in/ gives a name or service not known
 * Updated URL.
 * Ref #34/F.B. Peirs is laid-out differently than the other references
 * Formatted.
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * All the information is well-referenced. 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * No copyvios found. Shearonink (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * Stable, no edit-warring. Shearonink (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All the permissions are good. Shearonink (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Good illustrations serve the text. Shearonink (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * I will be giving this a few more readthroughs but everything looks pretty darn good at the moment. Shearonink (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I am still doing a few more proofreading-readthroughs but the only item mentioned above that is not adjusted yet is the agroecology-Wikilinking. Shearonink (talk) 06:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, fixed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No further issues found, everything's good to go - congrats, it's a GA. Shearonink (talk) 06:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I am still doing a few more proofreading-readthroughs but the only item mentioned above that is not adjusted yet is the agroecology-Wikilinking. Shearonink (talk) 06:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, fixed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No further issues found, everything's good to go - congrats, it's a GA. Shearonink (talk) 06:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)