Talk:Cross-country skiing/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Luxure (talk · contribs) 12:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Reviewer's comments:


 * 1) The article is well-written and adheres to basically everything
 * 2) It could however benefit from extra references, which will weed out possible original research. Please see my comments at 2a and 2c.
 * 3) There may just a bit too many images? This may just be nitpicking
 * 4) There are 4 dead links, (7, 15, 34 and 44), and the article needs more references
 * 5) Just one dead link (34), however, not really an issue considering quality of references.
 * 6) I am currently leaning towards a yes.
 * 7) I will press yes on 3 July if no other editors oppose. (Just going to wait for the GA Cup to begin, so reviewers participating, if they want, have a say)
 * 8) ✅ Article has sufficiently satisfied criteria.

Cheers,  Lux ure Σ  12:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your diligence in reviewing this article, Luxure. I've repaired links, as cited above. The image gallery is designed to supplement the core aspects of the activity (history, types of grooming at ski areas, disabled skiing, skijoring), but if you feel there are one or more redundant images, you could suggest which ones ought to go. As to the adequacy of citations, it would be helpful to know where you feel they are thin—I can attempt to provide more belt and suspenders there. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 15:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem! The images suit the article so they can stay. Citations after you fixed the dead ones are not really required anymore.  Lux ure Σ  02:43, 30 June 2015 (UTC)