Talk:Cross Colours

Press Release?
The end paragraph has too much language in that reads like a press release. The entire article may as well have been started and written by a Cross Colours employee. Not to mention, there is history that is worth noting here, as they used to advertise in rap magazines heavily, only to later have a investigative article written about them in The Source. If no one else can locate it, I'll add this information myself.Kuahmel (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Tags added
I have added POV and advertisement tags to the article, for obvious reasons. If the article isn't drastically cleaned up, it would need to go to AfD. --Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

And it needs them something terrible. It's gone from reading like a press release to reading like a catalog one gives out to dealers.Kuahmel (talk) 23:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

--this article is awful. reads like a sales brochure —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.224.241.69 (talk) 23:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)