Talk:Cross River Rail

Remove
I suggest that the 2013 Bus and Train Tunnel proposal section on the alternative design be reduced to just one paragraph. Its a failed proposal separate to this one and so the level of detail should be low on this page. It is currently around one third of the whole article. - Shiftchange (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I think it would be good to chop it down a couple of paragraphs because you do have a point, but they're basically three different takes on the same proposal and I think it's worth having a solid section on the LNP version of it as well. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 03:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cross River Rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101201050659/http://translink.com.au/about-translink/reporting-and-publications/media-releases/release/79 to http://www.translink.com.au/about-translink/reporting-and-publications/media-releases/release/79

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:09, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Corruption Allegations
Should we address the corruption allegations with the construction of the cross-river rail? More specifically the alleged purchase of properties near the site of the construction prior to the announcement of the project as they would increase in value. One notable figure would be Jackie Trad and the allegations surrounding her. They may or may not be correct, but I figured it might be worth mentioning the investigations. Joecompan (talk) 04:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)