Talk:Cross of Saint James/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 03:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

As promised, I'm picking this review back up. Review will be forthcoming. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 03:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Sources:

 * "cross moline". Meriam Webster. FN 3 needs to be filled out, not thrilled about a tertiary source but it's fine for now
 * '"The symbolic power of the Way of St. James". Five Sensations. August 25, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.' Is this a reliable source?
 * I recall that we didn't determine the veracity of this source


 * St. James. Encyclopedia Britannica. January 1, 2022.  Again, not thrilled with a tertiary source but I'll let it slide.
 * '"Postres del Mundo. Galicia: La Tarta de Santiago". Viajar Y Celebrar (in Spanish). August 8, 2017.' this is a travel blog

Images:

 * If you can make the gallery images larger, that would be ideal.
 * Image rights appear to be in order

Copy-Vios:

 * Random spot checks found nothing exciting.
 * Earwig isn't flagging anything, only proper nouns and simple phrases

Misc:

 * Nothing else

Prose

 * It is used widely throughout Spain and Portugal. Remove 'widely'
 * Again, this has been copy-edited to high heaven, there really isn't much left to do

So sorry for taking a week to get this out, I've been all tied up with Med School Apps. Thankfully I'll have a little down time now.


 * I worked on the images; swapped out both the encyclopedia and the dictionary. I found a new reference for the tart. Last item: Is five sensations a reliable source? Probably not. What to do? I am having trouble finding a reliable source for those two minor points. I could use the cathloic encylopeida for one, and maybe this for the other A pavement marker indicates the route of the Way of St James through [[Navarrete, La Rioja, Spain]]. --evrik (talk) 03:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * *I copied this message over from my talk page.
 * Images all look good, I am not particularly concerned about the tertiary sources since I understand that sourcing is limited. WP:Tertiary isn't an explicit forbidding, rather a general rule. I'd caution about adding too many images, there's already a link to the commons. Realistically, the fsensations source will need to be cut, unless there is some justification for it being reliable. I am personally unsure, it appears there may be some kind of editorial standard for the site but it also appears to be a blog run by one person. Is there a WP:BLOG rational?
 * I made an attempt to dig up sources on Newspapers.com, no such luck. Currently looking at Google Scholar to see if there's anything. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 23:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)


 * What about just dropping the two sentences that use the source as a reference?--evrik (talk)<
 * That'll work fine. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 13:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Done --evrik (talk) 23:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Evrik Looks good!! Thank you so much for putting up with my hectic schedule. At this point I think we're good to pass the article. It is well earned at this point, Congrats!!!. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 02:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)