Talk:CrowdMed

Unrelated to Conference Paper
I worked at CrowdMed from 2017-2020, and it is entirely unrelated to the conference paper about a blockchain consent mechanism published in 2019 that uses the same name. --ExistentialEnso (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

This reads like an advertisement
This article seems to go into a lot of detail about what services and benefits the platform offers, such as their package options and their handling of data. Some of these points like the 70% figure are self-reported/self-conducted from interviews (the source for the statistic in question points to an interview with the founder giving this statistic with no backing evidence or survey) and this article makes no effort to make it clear that these are claims made by CrowdMed and not by any independant body. This article either needs a total rewrite or deletion, the fact that this is right next to the actual site on search engine results and reads like an advertisement is dangerous, especially considering it's based in the field of healthcare. 2A01:388:2AD:112:0:0:1:7 (talk) 11:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Agreed, I would like to see some info on crowdmed that doesn't read like it came right from their website 172.58.19.61 (talk) 04:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)