Talk:Crowd simulation

One of two ways... and then there's a blank.--Airplaneman (talk) 00:51, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Spam magnet
The external links section seems to have become a place where everyone lists a personal-favorite or employer's product. That fails WP:EL and WP:NOTDIR. I removed them and left an editorial note there to help remind editors. DMacks (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Crowd simulation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110624225843/http://crowdsimulation.org:80/forum/ to http://crowdsimulation.org/forum
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130627102118/http://steersuite.cse.yorku.ca to http://steersuite.cse.yorku.ca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Update sections?
The topic should cover more than various crowd navigation algorithms. Efficient rendering is also important, and there are more applications like games, films and more practical simulations. I rewrote the lead section to clean up various concepts there and added references to show there are more material to cover. Qd33 cs (talk) 07:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

References for content you added
Hi everyone, please add references for what you claimed, like the uses in training for riot handling, safety science(where is that term used? it's not in Wikipedia yet) and sociology, and how have rule based AI been implemented and used for crowds. Qd33 cs (talk) 02:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

EvaluationKaylaGuan (talk) 04:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic "Crowd simulation," and the first paragraph that is also the introduction of the article is very attractive and interesting, which makes people want to know more about the topic.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? I checked some citations, and I think they all look great. The links work effectively. I searched some phrases in the linked articles, and I do not think there is any plagiarism.