Talk:Crowdsensing

Requested move 9 January 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. I gotta do a page swap anyways, so that helps. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM   (talk to me)  03:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Mobile crowdsensing → Crowdsensing – It doesn't necessarily involve mobile phones and if the article doesn't yet include information on other types of crowdsensing it could and should be expanded. Also 'crowdsensing' as a standalone term is the more commonly used term. Fixuture (talk) 22:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. JudgeRM   (talk to me)  20:13, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  --Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Support per this AFD discussion. The crowdsensing article was redirected here because this is a better article and it covers the topic sufficiently. We can and should move this to the more concise name. Brad  v  21:18, 24 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Relisting comment: This is complicated. Text from this old version of the target seems to have been merged into the current article, so its page history should be preserved for CCA etc. purposes. Perhaps the best way of doing that would be to merge the content from this article to that location, almost a cut-and-paste move but valid in this circumstance, see Copying within Wikipedia. As noted above (the post crossed mine and led to an edit conflict) another consideration is Articles for deletion/Crowdsensing where consensus was to redirect to the current title, perhaps not the best decision. Interested in other suggestions. There's a case for move, it's just how to best achieve it. Andrewa (talk) 21:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Whoever closes this can do a WP:SWAP, preserving the history of both pages. A copy-and-paste move would be ill-advised. Brad  v  21:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That would work too. The end result is much the same. Just so long as what is done is documented. Andrewa (talk) 23:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.