Talk:Crowne Plaza Times Square Manhattan/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 21:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this GAN shortly. Please ping me if there are any concerns or questions. Z1720 (talk) 21:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments:


 * Prose


 * "The hotel rooms have been closed since 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City." -> "The hotel rooms were closed in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City." to prevent MOS:CURRENT problems
 * "quote machines" What is this? Is there a wikilink to send readers to?
 * "to set aside about 5 percent of their space" should this be five per MOS:NUMERAL?
 * "that the interior "pleasingly anonymous," -> "that the interior was "pleasingly anonymous,"
 * In Note a, it should have a citation at the end.


 * Sources
 * Earwig does not bring up any concerns.
 * In ref 94, it should probably just say "New York / Staff" for the authorship.


 * Spot check
 * Version checked:
 * Sources checked: 6, 7, 16, 26, 47, 28, 98, 99
 * No concerns

I am going to place this on hold until the above are addressed. Please ping me if there are any questions. Z1720 (talk) 23:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Image
 * For "Crowne Plaza Times Square Exterior.jpg" (first image in the infobox) the summary says that the author is "Crowne Plaza Times Square" who claims to be the copyright holder of the picture. Is this information correct?
 * Other images do not cause concerns.
 * @Z1720, thanks for the review. I have addressed all the prose issues and removed the author from ref 94, since the author is unknown (and thus a staff author is implied). The uploader of the infobox image is actually Cherishgallant, but for some reason their username didn't show up in the file description. Nonetheless, I've replaced the infobox image with a daytime photo. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * My concerns have been addressed. I will promote this article. Congradulations. Z1720 (talk) 00:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)