Talk:Crowz

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Crowz/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is not illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * 2) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Needs images. Crowz  RSA  00:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Crowz  RSA  00:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is not illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * 2) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Needs images. Crowz  RSA  00:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Crowz  RSA  00:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Needs images. Crowz  RSA  00:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Crowz  RSA  00:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Wow, wow, this is an article about an album that isn't real and was never released. It has been deleted multiple times. It cites no reliable sources nor has virtually any prose. This should be deleted not promoted to a GA.  black ngold29  01:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * proves it is real, giving samples of songs featured on crowz. It's just obvious that it's real. Prove me wrong. Crowz  RSA  23:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Slipknot-metal.com is a fan site with no official connection to the band and therefore not a WP:RS; the same goes for Opium of the People which is the only other site cited in the article. You're right that the songs exist, but to the band Crowz is not and never was a real album, demo, EP, or anything else. It was never officially released, nor was it ever unofficially released.  black ngold29  03:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)