Talk:Crusades/Review of the archives

Review of the archives 28 feb 2020 - 27 march 2021
I reviewed again the discussions in the archives of Crusades (and a bit in its current talk page). There was an unanimous support for a second article, but not necessarily for what we could call a split, though it is hard to imagine a second article without some kind of splitting. Borsoka changed his mind, but only after the split. Regarding the two perspectives, one closer to the traditionalists view and the other closer to the generalists view, Borsoka and Dr. Grampinator say the article uses the generalists view. I am not sure about GPinkerton. Others say it is closer to the traditionalists view. In addition, Dr. Grampinator supports a separate (so a third) article with the traditionalists view, but [otherwise] says that the distinction traditionalists, generalists, etc. is not useful. He suggested a similar dichotomy : (1) one article with the generalists view (2) two articles, one with the traditionalists view and the other on every thing else and concluded that the article uses the generalists view. Dominic Mayers (talk) 01:08, 26 May 2021 (UTC)