Talk:Cry On/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MsDusa (talk · contribs) 22:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Production


 * I figure it's implied that they were a new studio at the time given that it is past tense
 * Multiple types of control scheme > Multiple control schemes
 * "The evoking" > "The evocation"

Cancellation and legacy


 * You could stand to summarize the first quotation.

That's about it.
 * Done. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * pog - Whadup, it&#39;s ya girl, Dusa (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)