Talk:Cryptoprocta spelea

Discussion about restoration
See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Palaeontology/Paleoart_review#Cryptoprocta_spelaea FunkMonk (talk) 20:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Are there any illustrations of the fossils in the original description, ? They may be in the public domain... FunkMonk (talk) 10:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Interesting, I had no idea that this review page existed! Sorry about culling the "restoration" image twice w/o much comment, but it really did not seem sufficiently detailed or aesthetically pleasing to be in the article. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:42, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, the section of that image is long archived, so the link doesn't work. But in any case, I think images of the actual fossils are always best to show in the taxobox, but we don't have any... FunkMonk (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cryptoprocta spelea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061127073601/http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/1334_z04n1a9.pdf to http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/1334_z04n1a9.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627094911/http://www.iucnredlist.org/ to http://www.iucnredlist.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)