Talk:Crystalline cohomology

Should the section on algebraic de Rham cohomology rather be moved to de Rham cohomology? Jakob.scholbach 04:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Definitely not! There is already a notice on the top of de Rham cohomology article linking here. However, this page begins to overtake the article on motivic cohomology in its treatment of various Weil cohomology theories. Arcfrk 20:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, I see the link in the de Rham page, but I still think, that the mathematical content if the section on algebraic de Rham coho. given here does (at least at the moment) not overlap with the crystalline part (except perhaps the idea, that both of them are Weil cohom. theories). Instead, the analogy of algebraic de Rham and classical de Rham cohomology is clear from the definition and they also give the same results (over C). So, why not put it there - in a subsection called "Algebraic de Rham cohomology"? Jakob.scholbach 23:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Examples
This page should discuss some of the examples in http://www.math.nyu.edu/~tschinke/books/finite-fields/final/09_wedhorn.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.212.185.82 (talk) 23:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crystalline cohomology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721024709/http://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/antoine.chambert-loir/publications/ to http://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/antoine.chambert-loir/publications

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:05, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Improvements + References

 * A mini-course on crystalline cohomology
 * Introduction to crystalline cohomology