Talk:Crystalmist Mountains

Notability
added for deletion for Notability, I can see no reason to delete this for Notability any more than the other Greyhawk Campaign Wikipedia entries.
 * Dwarvenbierschneeman, please go ahead and remove the tag if you feel this article meets the general notability guidelines; but please take a look at wp:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, also. ErikHaugen (talk) 20:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * And if you do remove the because there are good sources out there for Crystalmist Mountains, please include those references in the article. Thanks! ErikHaugen (talk) 20:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that was a delightful read, however I am now neither convinced this article deserves deletion, nor deserves to be saved. Expansion and more reference was the plan and goal, but i stopped when I realized i couldn't find one Living Greyhawk module used as a reference (just the earlier TSR/Gygax modules) so I am on a hunt to find out if this is even possible Cite, without violation of some rule or format. If you have advice on this i would be greatly appreciative Dwarvenbierschneeman (talk) 11:05, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how much advice I have to give, but one thing that would be compelling would be a few non-dnd references - eg saving throw has gained a certain level of notoriety outside of the game. It doesn't necessarily have to have extra-game notability to be notable, but I think it helps. ErikHaugen (talk) 17:40, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Anyone reading this, Are the Living Greyhawk Campaign modules usable as source material, or would this violate some sort of copyright or the like 98.249.0.112 (talk) 11:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think there are any copyright violations, and it is ok to use the modules as references if they're useful. They don't really satisfy the general notability guidelines, since they aren't independent, but it is probably good to include them in the article. ErikHaugen (talk) 15:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)