Talk:Cucumber (software)

Notability
I have re-added the notability tag as citations are currently limited to links promoting software manuals and a review by someone trying it out. These do little to establish the significant impact required. Fæ (talk) 18:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added a section on 'Popularity' with a couple of reference, as a start. Does this help? Mattwynne (talk) 14:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

We would like to have some assurance that you're not going to delete this page... Cucumber is an important and very active open source testing tool, its use is growing quickly, and there is a large and growing number of users. This small article is a placeholder that serves as a starting point for contributions. But contributors have now become skittish as there's apparently a threat of deletion. Can we have some assurance that the article will at least survive for a few months as we solicit contribution? Thanks.24.130.49.57 (talk) 17:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The notability tag is to encourage improvement and attract editors to improve sources and ensure the article addresses WP:GNG. It is not a deletion notice. Fæ (talk) 17:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe the primary obstacle keeping this article from being more of a part of wiki is that it talks a lot about how to use cucumber and not a lot about cucumber, its history, the people involved in its creation, its impact on the market... other stuff you'd expect in an encyclopedia article (WP:NOT) . I recognize that this is an emergent technology in a fast market, and that having a manual page rather than encyclopedia article hosted here is likely vital to the survival of this technology. I'd like to recommend against removing this page for whatever my random and anonymous voice is worth. But if you are looking for a strong guarantee 24.130.49.57, I would also recommend moving the content here to an externally hosted page, and including some more "flavor text". To get a large body of text up quickly you can have some potholes to behavior driven development, then explain how cucumber accomplishes these goals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.136.62.196 (talk) 18:23, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

The calculator example is misleading and inaccurate. It would be better to have a reference that points someone to a real working example than this one Mattwynne (talk) 11:35, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Mattwynne

Gherkin
"Others use the Gherkin parser but..."

I think a little more explanation about Gherkin is warranted, or at least a link or resource explaining the relationship between Gherkin and Cucumber. Especially because this page on Cucumber is the official redirect for "Gherkin (language)". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.137.194.148 (talk) 20:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Rewrite?
This doesn't seem like the right place to have a user manual. I'm considering a re-write that takes a more "encyclopaedic" approach, and that omits information that is best kept in the online documentation. Is there a process for doing this, or should I work in a sandbox and submit for review when I believe it's ready to replace the existing article? Sebrose (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Sources tag
The article seems to have enough verifying citations now. Can this tag be removed? Balle010 (talk) 14:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Acquisition?
It appears as though the commercial cucumber product created by the founders of cucumber is now owned by SmartBear. Is there an acquisition that should be mentioned on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.132.106.27 (talk) 03:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Gherkin example
As the German page did, could it be possible to display an example of the Gherkin syntax (or maybe create a page dedicated to Gherkin).

I see the Cucumber documentation is under MIT Licence, then it is allowed to pick this example there.

77.159.196.124 (talk) 15:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)