Talk:Cults (disambiguation)

Typo
Yeah, I meant Talk:Cult sorry. Simonm223 (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 03:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Cults → Cults (disambiguation) – Per WP:PLURALPT. I see nothing on this page to dissuade me from thinking that the clear primary topic of the term is the singular, Cult. They do tend to proliferate. bd2412 T 22:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Copied and pasted per the editor's request: Support - and feel free to copy paste this support onto all similar moves. I think this is now a case for use of technical move rather than full RM. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Support Gregkaye ✍ ♪  07:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose this one. The dab page shows that "Cults" is used for a number of things separate from the singular, including a couple of Scottish placenames, as well as several other entries. It's more helpful to our readers to keep this as a separate dab page, per WP:PLURALPT. Dohn joe (talk) 13:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Reiterate support, cults is commonly used as collective plural in the less scholarly press and media, and no one would think of Scottish placenames as rivaling cults as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of cults. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Support per nom. Obvious. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.