Talk:Culture of Malaysia/GA1

Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of January 28, 2011, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: The prose is weak. Most of the article reads not as an encyclopedic exploration of the topic but as a quick-fire list of facts about anything relating to Malaysia.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Many statements seem to be generalisations, but all the content is sourced.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Good depth of content. Presented in a logical way.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: No obvious problems.
 * 5. Article stability? No obvious problems.
 * 6. Images?: Engaging and sensible use of images.

Weak prose is the only thing that's holding this article back.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. AGK [&bull; ] 14:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)