Talk:Culture of human beings

Culture is the subject here, is it not? I don't understand what "of human beings" distinguishing in this case? Not from culture of bacteria nor from Primate socialization. Is this Introduction to Sociology? It seems to me simply a rival of the article Culture. Should they be merged, or should they be distinguished? Should a concise version of one be at the other, with a See main article... heading? --Wetman 8 July 2005 22:32 (UTC)
 * My guess is someone created this article without first checking to see if there are similar articles. Note too that little is verifiable or sourced.  I am very wary of phrases like "may be" and the use of the passive voice.  I know a fair bit about culture and I can easily argue (and provide sources) that for every "May be ..." in this article there is a more compelling "May not be ..." or at least "No longer is ..."  Honestly, I do not think there is any really valuable content here, is sounds more like everything one person knew after taking a couple of courses or reading a book.  I am not saying that the Culture article is perfect, but it is a much older and more worked-on article, and I think adding stuff from here will only lower its quality. Slrubenstein   |  Talk 19:21, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm in agreement, though I wasn't courageous enough to say so. --Wetman 22:00, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Please consider...
...moving this discussion to a more Appropriate place. -- CQ 09:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Merging
With the above comments taken into account, I am moving the content of this article to the talk page of Culture and converting this to a redirect. We will see if anything can be incorporated into the "Culture" article. Sunray 18:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)