Talk:Cumberland High School (Carlingford)

Fair use rationale for Image:Cumberlandhsnsw.png
Image:Cumberlandhsnsw.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

There are almost no references to anything on the page.
This page has nearly no references, with lots of information that seems like original research (a lot of it seems like information that people within the school would have typed in). Not sure if most of the information should be removed, or if anyone should be bothered to find references for the page.

DanTheGamer2003 (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Section removed
I have again removed the section titled "controversy" as WP:UNDUE. It was a single event that occurred over 10 years ago with no lasting implications. In addition, it attributes motives to the individuals involved and, notably, it states the brawl wasn't even initiated by students of the school. How is this notable enough for inclusion, let alone a separate (and discouraged) section? as you restored the section.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)