Talk:Cuneane

Redraw
A chemist should be brought in to redraw this stuff: Uniform fonts, back-front perspective, avoid optical illusions. Or put this crud on the page for M. C. Escher.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * ... Scheme 1 or Scheme 2? or the both? I like M. C. Escher works, thanks;)--Tim32 (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Ref
K. Kindler, K. Lührs looks not really connected to Cuneane.--Stone (talk) 20:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I got this reference from March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry, please checkup text of the paper, perhaps, it is wrong reference. Sorry for that.--Tim32 (talk) 14:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Similar reactions
I think the statement:"Similar reactions are known for homocubane (C9H10) and bishomocubane (C10H10)." should be moved to metal-ion-catalyzed σ-bond rearrangement. What do you think about?--Tim32 (talk) 14:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)