Talk:Cure for Sanity

Expansion of article (September 2015)
When I came across the article a while back, I found the writing to be confusing. Not incorrect, but written in a manner that rendered much of it understandable only to readers who were already familiar with the band's output. In doing a re-write, I added a section on Critical Reception and added timings to the Track Listing. Two specific items of note:
 * I removed the musician credits for the four individual band members because, strange as it may seem, they are not actually credited on any of the releases.
 * When giving the various dates of release, the band's official site (pweination.com) seems to use "01" as the default day of the month when the actual day is not known. I reached this opinion because it is very implausible that so many of the band's releases happened exactly on the first of the month.  To reflect this, I changed the dates in the info boxes to give only the month and the year of issue.  But there was a more substantial issue with the release date of the promo-only US single "Rhubarb".  Here, too, the official site uses "01" as the default number, but now uses it as the default month of issue.  As explained in one of the footnotes in the article, a release in January is dubious.  To reflect this, the more plausible month of July is labeled "probable" in the info box.  Consistent with this probable dating, I've re-ordered the list so that "Rhubarb" is the last single on the list.

I intend to submit this expanded version of the article as a Good Article nomination. However, the nomination will never be successful so long as it has the unsourced section on Samples. I'll wait a few weeks to see if anyone reading this can add sources (but note that the popular whosampled.com will not pass muster as a reliable source). If the section remains unsourced after a few weeks, I intend to delete it. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)