Talk:Currencies of Puerto Rico/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

To start, the lead needs to be broken up into multiple paragraphs. The entire article has many long paragraphs that can simply be split up. I didn't have time to review it all now, but what I read looks very good and well-referenced. Reywas92 Talk 21:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late reply, I'm on it. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  01:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I believe the first issues have been attended. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  02:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I have performed a small copyedit. Nothing except they odd typo, but there were a number capitalization errors.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thorough, exiting and well written article. No problems meeting the good article criteria. Congratulations!
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thorough, exiting and well written article. No problems meeting the good article criteria. Congratulations!
 * Thorough, exiting and well written article. No problems meeting the good article criteria. Congratulations!


 * Thanks for your review, sorry for the delayed response. -  Ca ri bb e a  n ~ H. Q.  22:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)