Talk:Customer intelligence

Dicdef
What is Dicdef? The word is not hypertexted and I can not find the explanation at this site.
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary. MER-C 13:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Wiki guru, please remove the warning from the article and...
kindly make some editing so that it won't die.

I do not intend to...
make the article dic-entry like. It is expanding...

For God sake....
the page is saved :-)

BTW, how to make the article searchable?

I have seen one of OI's techs on the net which is about Kraft's P&L calculation. Would someone out there please kindly create the relevant article?

Can we compare to CIS - Customer Information System? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.152.238 (talk) 18:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Wiki-regulator....
I have located the article to the associated categories and welcome to inspect it. If it's OK, please remove the relevant warnings.

reference links are outdated!
I've tested reference links 1 to 3 and they're all out dated or broken links! please correct them Mkiaeeha (talk) 19:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Customer intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20090424045459/http://www.g2i.org/article/2005/09/customer-intelligence to http://www.g2i.org/article/2005/09/customer-intelligence

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:42, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

April 2019 references
Coming to I observed a single reference. isbn 978-1-898085-33-1. A search within it seemed not to find a single mention of "Customer intelligence". I happened to observe removed about 5 references as opposed to attempting to recover them or marking them as dead links (one of which was a valid archived version). Concerned I therefore recovered those links from archives. The fact I have recovered these links does not mean I endorse them or say they are appropriate and are non promotional; in fact I have concerns on a couple and they were as far as I can tell possible placed by a blocked user who was previously in good standing. I may mark a source verification on some of the references. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)