Talk:Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110014709/http://www.dermis.net/dermisroot/en/42766/diagnose.htm to http://www.dermis.net/dermisroot/en/42766/diagnose.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080403214748/http://www.peacehealth.org/kbase/nord/nord1000.htm to http://www.peacehealth.org/kbase/nord/nord1000.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:26, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

icd
User:Tattycakes per you email have indicated ICD per --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

I find this article to be weirdly written and have several problems
I'll collect them as separate comments/topics here, but looking at the edit history there will probably become an edit war if any of the things are changed 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * First problem: "For a full and up-to-date description visit the CMTC webpages [...]". Why? Is the definition updated every 5 minutes or why would it be so hard just using the site as a reference instead? 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * related: Is there *really* no .com or .co.uk or .org site that is equally good? Why a Netherlands domain? And why the insistance to make it a part of the main text? 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Second problem: why have a genetics chart AND a cause section that says that "cases appear sporadically" and "Hypothesises include". Either we know that it's genetic (with possible mutations as a cause), or the cause it's unknown or unconfirmed (and it that case the image should br removed) 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Third problem: "People with visible marks generally feel fine (physically) and can act normally, but when it is mentioned, they may become withdrawn and self-conscious."
 * wow, what a delightfully unhelpful way to describe "yeah it can be hard to look different sometimes" and try to make a completely normal reaction sound like a symptom 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)