Talk:Cyberbit

Use of the term "Cyberbit" to mean something else
In (the "History" section of) this


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D-Link&oldid=1157547181

specific version or "revision" of the article about [the company] "D-Link", there is a sentence that says"In 2021, D-Link announced to become the agent for the international information security brand, Cyberbit in Taiwan, and launched the new EAGLE PRO AI series transforming home Wi-Fi experiences."and it is probably NOT talking about ANY "serif Unicode font", because -- (as it says in the 'blockquote'd [indented] QUOTE above) -- it is talking about some "information security brand, Cyberbit".

So ... maybe it should not be including a wikilink (hyperlink) [pointing] to "Cyberbit"; in that case, [maybe there should be a comment in the "Talk:" page for the article about the company "D-Link" ... perhaps linking to, or quoting from, this comment, here; or] maybe the article about "Cyberbit" should have a hatnote saying something about disambiguation. (maybe both?)

Just a suggestion. Thanks for listening. Mike Schwartz (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2023 (UTC) (("updated":)) 16:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

link to here, from another "Talk:" page
Please see Talk:D-Link

Thanks. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)