Talk:Cyborg Kuro-chan/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 03:01, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 03:01, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of May 21, 2011, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Writing quality is fair. This article could use additional copyediting. I would recommend before going for another GAN, seeking out Peer Review, and soliciting input from previously uninvolved editors.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Quick fail here. Due to significant sourcing concerns raised, including unsourced info and unreliably sourced info, examples: and diff
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Quick fail here. Volumes sect is incomplete. Other sects should not be in this main article, but spun out into sub-lists and other related pages.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Concerns here, due to above concerns raised about reliability of sources.
 * 5. Article stability? Upon inspection of article edit history and talk page, no major outstanding issues here.
 * 6. Images?: Upon inspection of (3) image pages, all images are fair use, with appropriate fair use rationales.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— -- Cirt (talk) 13:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)