Talk:Cycada (compatibility layer)

Notability
Hello, I'm not sure if this article is notable at all. It is basically non-released, commercial software. So for a start, the "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball" rule applies. Also, it doesn't really fit into the software notability guidelines.

It currently has 4 sources, out of which one is a primary one and thus invalid for notability, and the other 3 are basically just trivial ones that quote the article but don't really review the material in any detailed way. I don't think these qualify as secondary sources from a notability point of view, and besides, they are clearly part of an initial flurry of activity around the initial article.

After this initial flurry nothing else has been published about this software so it may even be vaporware.

I think I'm going to submit the article for deletion soon, unless I can find some additional reviews for it. 81.33.164.246 (talk) 15:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)