Talk:Cyclone Graham/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All references need publisher information.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Just one issue with the references that needs to be addressed before the article is promoted to GA status, so I am putting the article on hold to allow time to deal with this concern. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. The references in question had the publisher as their author, so I switched it around. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  18:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks (my third GA today!) :-) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  18:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)