Talk:Cyclone Honorinina/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 02:31, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

: The article looks to comply with MOS policies for grammar, layout, and structure. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 23:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article makes frequent use of a decently sized list of reliable sources, and does not seem to bear any original research. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 23:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article presents a thorough encyclopedic coverage of its topic, without incorporation of trivial details. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 22:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article does not demonstrate any bias concerning its topic. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC) . The article, a recent addition to Wikipedia's content, has not presently suffered any disruptive editing. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 17:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC) : The article's two images serve a relevant usage, and are appropriately licensed. Neither defies fair use policies; both are public domain. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 17:23, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

After reading through this article and checking it against the above criteria, I believe it qualifies for GA status. Congratulations! One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 23:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)