Talk:Cyclone Keila/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

GA criteria
: The article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as general layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: There are no signs of original research. The article uses many reputable sources, and makes frequent citations to them. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to cover all relevant aspects of its topic, without becoming trivial at any point. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article's tone remains consistently neutral. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC) . The only sort of disruptive editing in this article's history, at the current time, happened back in late 2011; it is at present stable. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC) : All three images currently used in the article are public domain, so there is no risk of copyright violations. All three of them provide important illustration to the article as well, and all captions seem appropriate. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

I believe this article qualifies as GA. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)