Talk:Cyclone Tessi

Critism
Does this article look big enough and well detailed to not be suggested to be merged back in the Cyclone season article, i put a fair bit of time and effort on this one. -- Gertzy 1st October 2006.
 * The article looks nice, but if I were you, try to get as much info as possible. From what I have seen around, articles of this length do get merged. RaNdOm26 17:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll put it at a start for now, but I think you need to do this to get it to B-class. Make the storm history into 2 or 3 paragraphs, turn that table of yours into sentences, remove the town headers in the impact sections so it's just one big section, and make each town a paragraph, metrication, and finally, you need references using inline sourcing. If you don't know what that is, you do this; for starters, just do . When you get better at it, you can use cite web and cite book and cite news and all those other cool things, you might even be able to pass GA if you do this stuff. Good luck! íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 11:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Citations, better tone, proper capitalisation, WP:MOSDATE, etc. This is a stub, not a start. Too short. – Chacor 06:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Merge
There isn't enough info to justify the existence of this article. It is also not notable enough, did little damage, and caused no deaths. Merge. – Chacor 06:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Article has been merged since there isn't a whole lot here that's not in the season article. If more information can be found, add it there, and if a significant amount of information gets found, feel free to recreate. --Core des at (talk) 07:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)