Talk:Cyclops64

Not Power Arch
Just for the record.. I've found no evidence that Cyclops64 is Power Architecture technology. I would be surprised if it is. -- Henriok
 * I stand corrected. Cyclops' arhitecture is based on Power Architecture.. a small subset of instructions, with enhancements to fit the cellular, multithreaded design. -- Henriok (talk) 19:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Cell Processor
The Bluegene page states that the Cyclops64 is based on Cellular_architecture (ala Playstation 3), but the Cyclops64 page doesn't seem to state this. BartonM 21:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The Cell processor and cellular architectures are different (but related). The cell processor is an example (on a small scale) of cellular architectures. Cyclops64 (and, for example, Sun T1 Niagara) are larger scale examples of cellular architectures. Raul654 14:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:N
In your considered opinion, Raul, does this article meet the WP:N and WP:RS standards? Particularly concerning the lack of citations/references? Avruch Talk 21:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyclops64. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130606000628/http://www.capsl.udel.edu/~venetis/Cyclops-64.html to http://www.capsl.udel.edu/~venetis/Cyclops-64.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)