Talk:Cyprien Ntaryamira/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MatEditzWiki (talk · contribs) 08:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

MatEditzWiki (talk) 08:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment First check in Immediate failures
 * It is not a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
 * It does not contain copyright violations
 * It does not have cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include cleanup, POV, unreferenced or large numbers of citation needed, clarify, or similar tags.
 * It is stable and does not have edit warring on the page

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment First criteria (well written) check:
 * a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; check
 * b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
 * lead section: check
 * layout: check
 * words to watch: check
 * fiction: guideline check not needed
 * list incorporation: guideline check not needed

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Second criteria (verifiable) check:
 * a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; check
 * b. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; check
 * c. it contains no original research; check
 * d. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. check

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Third criteria (broad in its coverage) check:
 * a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; check
 * b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. check

Passed. MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Fourth criteria check:
 * a. it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. check
 * b. it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. check
 * c. illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: check
 * ca. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; check
 * cb. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. check