Talk:Cyprus in the Eurovision Song Contest 2004/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 18:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

I am happy to work with you again, it has definitely been a while; this should be reviewed in no time! --K. Peake 17:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * Remove wikilink on "Stronger Every Minute" since this literally leads to the article for the participation
 * I would suggest also mentioning that the Greek lyrics were removed for the song to be completely in English in the lead as the third sentence
 * The lead should be two paras instead; please move the entry decision to the first para along with the above sentence as will come before it
 * "as a CD single and Andreas performed" → "as a CD single with a music video. Andreas also performed"
 * Merge the last para with the second one per earlier
 * I ended up just rewriting the whole lead. Grk1011 (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Background

 * "Prior to the 2003 contest," → "Prior to the 2004 contest,"
 * Pipe 1981 to Eurovision Song Contest 1981
 * "when its selected song" → "when the country's selected song"
 * Remove the comma after previously released and also, move [2] to the end of the sentence instead
 * "By 2003, the country's" → "By 2004, the country's"
 * "Its worst finish in" → "The country's worst finish in"
 * "however, for this year's contest," → "however, for the 2004 contest,"
 * Done. Grk1011 (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

National final

 * Wikilink Eurovision Song Contest 2004
 * The five-member selection committee are not sourced themselves, although I must say props on how well-written this first para's prose is to you!
 * The location and host of the national final are not backed up by the source
 * "for the United Kingdom." → "for the UK."
 * Pipe 2003 to Cyprus in the Eurovision Song Contest 2003
 * Table looks good!
 * Done. Grk1011 (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Promotion

 * The CD single release is not sourced; add a ref for this in prose to justify the img
 * Mention about the video's synopsis per the source because it does not have its own article
 * I removed this section. The CD single was apparently promo only, so finding reliable sources for what that entailed wasn't possible, as such I also removed the cover photo. I added a synopsis to the video, but also moved it to the section above. Grk1011 (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

At Eurovision

 * Move the img to the left please to avoid overlap
 * Change the United Kingdom to the UK in prose
 * Done. Grk1011 (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Voting

 * Good all round, really well-written and the tables of course!

Final comments and verdict

 * until all of the issues are fixed; this went nice and quickly! --K. Peake 18:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm going to be away for a few days, but I got started on this just in case I was able to get it done. A couple comments above. I'll likely be able to respond on Sunday and finish up then. Grk1011 (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi should be all set! A couple comments above but otherwise I think it's looking good! Thank you! Grk1011 (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I think the issue with the eurovision.tv are that the refs are already citing a publisher clearly so the other part is not needed, whereas the music video sentence needs a ref invoked after it please. --K. Peake 09:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The way I read it, European Broadcasting Union and eurovision.tv are sufficiently different enough to warrant both fields being populated. The exceptions in the guideline where you would only use one pertain to scenarios where they are the same or very similar i.e. "publisher=Eurovision Song Contest" and "website=eurovision.tv"; that's not the case here. With respect to the video synopsis, MOS:PLOTSOURCE would be the relevant guideline and it states that it does not need to be sourced with in-line citations, as it is generally assumed that the work itself is the primary source for the plot summary. With this in mind, I kept to obvious descriptions that anyone who watches the video could easily make, without going into the meaning or interpretation, which would definitely need a source link. Grk1011 (talk)
 * ✅ now, I am very happy with your response here! --K. Peake 13:52, 24 June 2024 (UTC)