Talk:Cyrillization of Chinese from Wade-Giles/Archive

Wrong
User:Wiki Wikardo — you got it wrong. The Palladiy system refers to the Сyrillic text, the Wade-Giles refers to the English text here. So the table establishes the correspondence between Wade-Giles system and the Palladiy system. (Btw, Pinyin is based on Palladiy, not the other way round — becauses Palladiy is much older). — Monedula 06:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Aspirated syllables
You missed the aspirated syllables in your article.

Merge the two Palladiy system articles
What's the point of having two different articles about the Palladiy system when the topic of discussion is about Chinese and Cyrillic alphabet? The distinction between Wade-Giles and pinyin can be easily made by using two different columns. I have suggested a merge. --Voidvector (talk) 11:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Spent sometime with excel and merged the two table, some of the Cyrillic entries only appear in one of them, i tried to match duplicate entries as best as i can:
 * I agree with you. I updated table. Looks okay to me now. If nobody provides a reason why these two articles should not be merged, then, well, there is no reason why they shouldn't be merged. Cababunga (talk) 06:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)