Talk:Cysmethynil

Group #9 Doing the Review
Review #1 Kmvogel2 (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)There's a lot of good information, maybe you could split it up more though so it's easier to navigate your page and find the property or the information about the chemical that one's looking for. The REACT wikipedia page gave examples of headers such as - Properties, Occurrences, History, Production,and Reactions. Are there any hazards of the chemical that you can elaborate on? If it's available, maybe you can show the reaction of how Cysmethyni is formed or even a picture of the reaction. Otherwise everything looks great. There are a lot of references which is good. Great job so far! Kmvogel2 (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #2 Smkirk2 (talk) 9:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)This page looks great! I love that you have so much detail and that your sections are very clear and precise. I agree with Katrina on the fact that there could be a little more information on what the reaction mechanism would be of how this molecule is formed. I think that you have a lot of awesome information that follows the guidelines perfectly. Just be sure to have as much detail as possible and continue with the good work!Smkirk2 (talk) 9:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #3 gargas2 (talk) Overall the structure of the page looks fantastic! I think it is well organized and clear. However, I would consider breaking up the sections a bit. Also, I feel that the information under the heading "Reactions" would be better titled something like "Uses" since it discusses the use of the product in potentially reducing tumor size. This part was very interesting but the title of "Reactions" did not seem to fit. The other thing I would suggest would to try to look for just a couple hazards for the product. I know how hard it is to research compounds that aren't already on wikipedia though! Really great job! Gargas2 (talk) 15:50, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

This article is not ready to be uploaded
Please do not upload this article until your teacher or you has interacted with the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals. It is not good enough for Wikipedia yet. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)