Talk:D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Davidkinnen (talk · contribs) 15:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for taking this on. Timely, as it's his centenary! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * Hi, I'm a bit surprised you've immediately filled in "fail" for a couple of sections: the normal procedure is for you to say what you think needs to be done, and for me to respond by updating the article or otherwise replying, especially as you already find the article to be "A-class". To avoid the bot automatically doing anything premature with this GAN, I've boldly reset these items to "?", hope that's ok. Could you let me know (here or above) what is wrong with the items that aren't complete, so I can fix them? Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:52, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Apologies, this is the first time I have undertaken a Good Article review, and I made the choices that seemed relevant at the time. There is no denying that this article is incredibly well-written, well-researched, and well-referenced. I had understood the process to be me posting the initial review, and then seeing others make their responses. At which point I would modify my review to better match an understanding from other users and editors. I no way was meaning to denigrate the work you have put in here. Davidkinnen (talk) 15:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That's fine (and what I guessed), and I didn't feel at all denigrated, just wondering if the system was about to go wrong. I'll attend to your comments shortly. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * : I replied to all your queries; did I miss something, or can we proceed? Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * : Apologies for the delay. Good Article agreed. Davidkinnen (talk) 19:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)