Talk:Dælenenga idrettspark/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 12:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

I shall review.


 * Infobox
 * "Oslo Municipality" -> "Municipality of Oslo". ✅


 * Lead
 * "Oslo Municipality" -> "Municipality of Oslo". ✅


 * History
 * Seems good, contains good information, references fine.


 * Facilities
 * Yep, good. "Ruter" may need explaining, but not required.


 * Events
 * The information included there is fine. The three tables are correctly formatted and are used correctly.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Pass. ⇒ T A  P  12:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank for taking the time for both this and the other review. Arsenikk (talk)  15:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)