Talk:D.C. Home Rule

Merge
I think that it would be much better to merge D.C. Statehood with New Columbia than to merge with D.C. Home Rule. Scoutersig 15:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Don't merge D.C. voting rights and D.C. home rule See here for my original reason for separating these two pages. The issues of voting rights and of home rule are different from each other, though some proposed remedies would address both problems. I think that voting rights and home rule need to be discussed separately, while D.C. Statehood (a proposed remedy that would address both problems) should not be merged with either article. I agree that merging D.C. Statehood with New Columbia is a good idea. See here for that discussion. --BlueMoonlet 05:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. D.C. Home Rule is their current system of governance, while D.C. Statehood is a movement for statehood, and to do away with home rule. I'm going to change the heading to request merging with the New Columbia article, since the person who suggested the merge with DC Statehood did not make any comments here about merging the article. --Riley 22:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Since no one but me has said anything on this subject for a month, I am removing the merge tag on D.C. voting rights. --BlueMoonlet 18:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)