Talk:D. Imman

Undue weight
Having a whole separate section for for a table for projects that are not finished or have not even begun gives WP:UNDUE emphasis particularly when they are already covered in the body text. When added to the intent of WP:CRYSTAL / WP:NFF / WP:NOTADVERT its clear that the section is inappropriate. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * not WP:Crystal, because it's sourced, not WP:NFF, because all films HAVE started (what more, one album has even been released already!) and WP:ADVERT?? Huh? What is being promoted here? And why on earth UNDUE? This is not some theory that can be called into question, this is fact! Just that one editor has a problem with it, he is in the minority! I don't see any problems with this and nobody else will either. Wilhelm Chandrahaasan (talk) 16:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) it is crystal to call them films because, as per the sources, they are NOT YET FILMS they are merely works in progress that may or may not become completed films. NFF applies because especially until something reaches the principal photography stage we are in CRYSTAL land. 3) ADVERT applies as because since they are not yet actually films, the only value is to promote upcoming projects. Hence 4) UNDUE weight in the article by giving not-yet films a full stand alone section. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  18:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Not CRYSTAL, if its verifiable, no matter if it is called "film", "not-yet-film", or "batzewanoglu". Films in production do have articles too, as per you logic that would be CRYSTAL, but according to NFF films in production may have articles, ergo it's not CRYSTAL! (Of course, you won't accept, I don't mind!) And NFF first of all refers to creating a new article. And all these film HAVE STARTED principal photography!! Do you actually even know what "principal photography" is, I seriously doubt it. ADVERT...hahaha, the best of the lot! As said before, "Not-yet-films" do even have articles, so do you consider that as advertising too? Oh boy! And UNDUE is about something totally different, dude. The problem is that you are referring to guidelines that you have (apparently!) not even understood, and mostly it backfires because the guidelines do support my edits. But the bigger problem is your ego! Take a chill pill bro! Wilhelm Chandrahaasan (talk) 10:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on D. Imman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chennaionline.com/chat/celebchat/17imman-profile.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on D. Imman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211105635/http://www.chennaionline.com/chat/celebchat/17imman-profile.asp to http://www.chennaionline.com/chat/celebchat/17imman-profile.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)