Talk:DALL-E

Changed website URL
The previous URL was a link to an official blog post about Dall·E 2, not the actual website used as the direct interface for using the software. The old URL was, https://openai.com/blog/dall-e/. The new URL is https://labs.openai.com/.

⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, talk 20:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

I want a nail-related lego to be stylish and at the same time simple and attractive. I received specialized training in Istanbul. I live in Rasht. Write me a text that I can use in Dal-e. 5.121.217.67 (talk) 09:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * This isn't the website for talking with OpenAI's software. To talk to ChatGPT, go to https://chat.openai.com. To use Dall•E 2, go to https://labs.openai.com/.
 * ⇒  Zhing-Za , they/them, 17:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Dalle 3 on Microsoft
looks like dalle 3 has been implemented on Microsoft before openai's official release. https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/3/23901963/bing-chat-dall-e-3-openai-image-generator

Should it be included? 103.172.29.157 (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture
— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 17 December 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

DALL-E → DALL·E – Misspelled: OpenAI has consistently referred to its image generation model as "DALL·E" without a dash in its official communications. This naming convention has been always maintained since the model's introduction, so there's no reason to change its name by using a dash.&#32;FaviFake (talk) 11:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 18:01, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per MOS:TM. The provided rationale has no relevance to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose, stylism. 162 etc. (talk) 00:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per MOS:TMRULES—blindlynx 04:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Oppose Sebbog13 (talk) 00:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Oppose Agree with BarrelProof,162 etc., and blindlynx above. I'll also point out that the first few reliable secondary sources I've checked all use a dash in the name, showing that using the dash is commonplace and supported by sources, like NPR at Surreal or too real? Breathtaking AI tool DALL-E takes its images to a bigger stage and The Guardian at From Trump Nevermind babies to deep fakes: DALL-E and the ethics of AI art. Elspea756 (talk) 02:16, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Technically DALL-E is art theft
I’m just gonna straight up say it. DALL-E and most AI image generators are art theft. The only reason they haven’t been classified as theft by any law makers is because of how new this whole AI stuff is.

AI art is theft because for starters all of these AI images generators admit they use images they got off from the internet. This Wikipedia article even says this

“DALL·E's model is a multimodal implementation of GPT-3 with 12 billion parameters which "swaps text for pixels," trained on text–image pairs from the Internet.”

Except they like to word them as “these generator learns from images posted on the internet.”

It also seems unlikely that most of the images they use are in the public domain. CycoMa1 (talk) 02:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I mean come on they know that their program is problematic the article even says this.

“ DALL·E 3 is designed to block users from generating art in the style of currently-living artists.” CycoMa1 (talk) 05:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

It feels like this article is just giving undue weight on the matter.CycoMa1 (talk) 05:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The talk page is WP:NOTAFORUM. I fail to see a case for the undue weight template you added. Are you aware of reliable secondary sources discussing your concerns? WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 12:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)