Talk:DC's Young Animal

Requested move 9 May 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not Moved. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric  05:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Young Animal (DC Comics) → Young Animal – Move and just use a hatnote. No need for a dab with two items. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This proposal assumes that the DC imprint is the clear primary topic, which I'm not sure is the case. The manga publication has been around for a lot longer (and has a larger circulation). -Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose – |Young_Animal_(DC_Comics)|Young_Animal This graph compares views for the article about the manga magazine (originally pink, blue since the article was renamed) and the article about the DC imprint (green). While the latter is higher, it isn't dramatically higher. And it's unclear which will have greater long-term significance. WP:2DABS says that in that case, the name they share should be a disambiguation page. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose - the newer article is getting a little more traffic like Jason said, but I don't think it's enough to declare primary, especially since the new subject is less than a year old. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.