Talk:DDR4 SDRAM/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk)  22:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Otherwise the article is well-written, interesting and encyclopedic. Placing on hold until the above has been seen to. Arsenikk (talk)  22:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments:
 * Is 'nm' namometer? If so, use the full word. Initialisms should be avoided at first use. I notice it is linked on fourth or so use, the link should be in the first mention. The same with Mb/s and MHz as an initialism and the linking of volt and DDR late in the article. This aspects needs a thorough clean-up for the whole article, such as CAS, CRC etc.
 * How can one in 2011 know what the market share of DDR3 will be in 2012 (market share five years after 2007 launch)?
 * The sentence starting with "In February 2009" reads awkward.
 * The fair use image is probably fine until the article reaches sales, at which time it would have to be replaced by a free image.
 * 'bandwidth' and 'point-to-point' are both disambig pages.
 * Link three under ref 28 is dead.
 * As 'Synchronous dynamic random access memory' is linked in the article, it should not be in the see also section.
 * Quotes should be in quotation marks, not italics (probably not a GA criteria, but I'll mention it anyways).
 * Did some minor tweaking.
 * I am failing the article as no work has been done in three weeks to meet the above comments. Arsenikk (talk)  20:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)