Talk:DIEP flap

note
This is not a topic I know a great deal about, but it reads somewhat biassed to me. "Unfortunately", etc. The language could also use a bit of a cleanup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.246.213.37 (talk) 12:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC) The claims made for the DIEP flap procedure are substantial. The fact that these claims have not yet been substantiated, and perhaps will not be substantiated, are critical information for potential candidates. I hope the author keeps this article current. I am baffled that this article is assigned low importance.Harry1948 (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Neutrality Template Flag Removal
Since the noted bias was removed in 2015, the neutrality flag seems to be a candidate for removal now.

73.18.173.223 (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Not quite biased but still poorly written
Bias is less in the fact that it presents the facts of the article without citations. This seems like it was written by a surgeon who performs the procedure themselves. While well intentioned there are a lot of unsubstantiated claims. The format isn't quite up to the standards of Wikipedia. Unfortunately, I don't know enough about the subject matter to do the complete rewrite it deserves but dear lord please someone fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frapsity (talk • contribs) 13:37, 26 December 2018 (UTC)