Talk:DP World/Archives/2012

Ownership
Private company? Isn't it owned by the state of the UAE? (I can't believe I'm the first to comment here!) --BDD 18:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

This page ought to be about the company
Is this the only Wikipedia page about this ports controversy? I think that this page should be about the company and that the controversy should really be detailed on a page that actually is about the controversy and not the company.–Clpalmore 23:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * agreed - the article has now been created and I have cut out a lot of detail from this article. PeterEastern (talk) 22:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

David Sanborn
I think the link on this page may go to the wrong David Sanborn.


 * Right. It should go to David C. Sanborn or Dave Sanborn. I started 2 pages by mistake; should have made only one, and now they need merging. --Uncle Ed 14:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Bush administration controverseys
I added the cat because its very hard for people looking for info about the ports controversey to find it without knowing the name of the company. Once (and if I guess) a subarticle for the controversey is created, the category can be moved there. savidan(talk) (e@) 17:04, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually I'll be bold and do that myself. savidan(talk) (e@) 17:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

News articles

 * DPW was formed by a September 2005 merger of Dubai Port Authority and Dubai Port International. DPW is 100 percent owned by the government of the Emirate of Dubai via a Dubai government holding company called the PCFC (Ports, Customs, and Free Zone Corporation). The government holding company is headed by the ruler of Dubai, Shiek Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, who took over on Jan. 4, 2006, following the death of his father, Sheikh Maktoum. [ http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48907 ]


 * DPW is a company owned by the government of Dubai, a member state of the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

Points of view on the controversy

 * Dubai Ports World has invested money in terrorists companiea and should not be given the right to own our ports, Locke

Above was deleted from the article as "vandalism" but is a popular POV on the issue. How should we describe this POV? --Uncle Ed 14:19, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Another Point of View
I'm not really worried about security. I just don't think we should allow any state-owned foreign companies to own anything in the U.S. If it's a private company that's fine. A private company would consider the consumers, and an American state-run company would consider the American public, but a foreign state-run company would consider the interests of their country over the interests of ours.

I didn't put that in there because its POV. How should we describe this?

I'd also like to add that we need to change that box that says its private to say that it's state-owned.


 * Quite a few Americans are opposed to foreign investment, particulary when it's an investment by a government. Like China. It's a big and touchy issue.


 * Handle the POV by identify who wrote that opinion. Maybe some right-wing Christian like Pat Buchanan? Or that 700 Club guy? --Uncle Ed 20:10, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

possible copyright infringement?
The 'facts' in this story are copied verbatim from the Reuters story referenced at the bottom of the page. Is this allowed?


 * Small portions of news stories may be copied verbatim with credit. Please copy and paste the questionable passage below, and I'll ask our copyright experts to check it. --Uncle Ed 15:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Links
Does there really need to be two links to far left blogs about this? We know the left is against this, it's something a republican president did. It's an overstatement, and these sources are in no way non biased. That, and I'm against using blogs as sources for anything other than humor.--Arcaynn 05:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DP logo.gif
Image:DP logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Information about the controversy should not be in this article
It should be in Dubai Ports World Controversy instead. Now it's over a year later, that information just looks unnecessary and distracting, and no longer relevant to this article; a simple link to the article about the 2006 controversy would suffice. Terraxos 15:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I think it should be in here but shortened and provide a link to Dubai Ports World Controversy, since that controversy is a very notable political subject.--201.230.35.185 (talk) 19:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Done - I have now cut the detail down considerably. PeterEastern (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

ownership structure? public or a subsidiary of Dubai World
I am confused about the ownership structure. Dubia World claims that it is the holding company, however DP World indicate that it was 'admitted to the official list of securities on NASDAQ Dubai'. So, are they a public company or what? PeterEastern (talk) 22:49, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Now resolved - only 23% of the stock was floated in 2007 which is now reflected in the article and referenced. PeterEastern (talk) 05:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was page moved. 70.29.211.163 (talk) 09:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Dubai Ports World → DP World — DP World is the current and consistently used name for the company. --PeterEastern (talk) 05:36, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Formatting
I was about to edit it to fix the formatting at the top, it looks very broken, but I couldn't make heads of tails of it, as it looks completely fine. Can someone take a look at it and let me know what's what there?

I'd like to change the list of 'Locations of DP World's operations' to a sortable table format. Headings will be: Terminal name; Location; Company Region; number of berths; Depth Alongside; Terminal Area; Local Website and Coordinates. Hunner75 (talk) 10:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC) Please see my user page for Declaration of Conflict of Interest for DP World Hunner75 (talk) 10:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I've now introduced a table, containing the data described above. However, my colour coding needs to be replaced with a more compliant method to indicate "new developments" and "non container operations". Hunner75 (talk) 20:53, 8 April 2012 (UTC) Please see my user page for Declaration of Conflict of Interest for DP World Hunner75 (talk) 10:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

History section
I propose a re-structure of the History using the following headings:

1 History

1.1 Early History

1.2 2006: Port security controversy

1.3 2007-2011: NASDAQ Dubai listing

1.4 2011-Present: London dual listing

No text will be added or removed, simply restructured for a better bird's eye view. Hunner75 (talk) 17:11, 13 April 2012 (UTC) Please see my user page for Declaration of Conflict of Interest for DP World Hunner75 (talk) 10:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Corporate Affairs section
I propose to add a new Corporate Affairs section using the following headings:

2 Corporate Affairs

2.1 Supply Chain Security Certification

Details of ISO28000 and Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) certification

2.2 Counter Piracy

Hosting the public-private international counter piracy conference in Dubai

2.3 Sponsorship

Major golf tournaments

Please see my user page for Declaration of Conflict of Interest for DP World Hunner75 (talk) 10:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)