Talk:Dacia Nova

Fair use rationale for Image:Dacia Nova.jpg
Image:Dacia Nova.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Peugeot 309 floorplan
this article suggest that the floorplan come from the peugeot 309: http://www.autosoviet.altervista.org/ENGLISH-automotorusse9-D%28dacia%29.htm Julien1A (talk) 12:50, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

The article you quoted has nothing to do with reality. They mentioned 1997 as the launch year for Dacia Nova when in reality it was 1995. It also implies that the Nova had a SuperNova trim level, when in reality SuperNova was a 3rd generation R52x. The naming also complicates things a little.

R523 and R524 were initially the names for the two body flavors. R523 had the tailgate with the larger and curved glass while the R524 had the tailgate commonly associated with Dacia Nova and SuperNova. However, due to certification costs, considering that the tailgate was the only difference, Dacia certified the cars as follows: R52310 - was either R523 or R524 body with the 810-20 1.3L Engine with the 510-01 MTX with a 180mm Clutch R52311 - was either R523 or R524 body with the 102-35 1.4L Engine and the 510-01 MTX with a 200mm Clutch R52319 - was either R523 or R524 body with the 106-20 or 106-21 1.6L carburated engine with 510-03 or 510-02 MTX R52320 - was the R524 body with the 106-30 engine (basically 106-20 with Motronic 3 injection) with the 510-03 MTX R52315 - was the SuperNova in different incarnations with the 1.4SOHC engine from Renault There was also a Nova GLi with the 102-45 engine which has a different code but I can't find it. Here's the complete table for all the Nova/SuperNova and Solenza cars: All the information is from the MR523/PS523, MR524/PS524 and MR525/PS525 (the workshop manual and the part catalogues for the 3 cars). D3vi1 (talk) 14:51, 06 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Dacia Nova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100705132649/http://www.romaniancars.ro:80/dacia-nova to http://www.romaniancars.ro/dacia-nova

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)