Talk:Dacians/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 05:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi,I will be doing the review for this article.Firstly I will recommend you to provide citiations for the places where there is the citiation needed tag.Thanks.RRD13 (talk) 05:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I will be reviewing those tags shortly.--Codrin.B (talk) 09:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi! I tackled all the "citation needed" tags, adding sources where I found them or removed unsourced statements.--Codrin.B (talk) 09:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Origins and ethnogenesis In the absence of written historical records-Why?Did writing was not known to them? Indo-Europeanization was complete by the beginning of the Bronze Age-You can explain it in brief(not more than 2 sentences). There are just single sentence lines which can be expanded I have put a  RRD13 (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC) The Currency section needs referencing. The small paragraphs at the end of Material Culture makes it horrible RRD13 (talk) 10:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I've combined several small paragraphs, and two very small sub-sections, in the Dacians section. See if this looks better. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, I've gotten rid of any one-sentence paragraphs during my recent copyedit. — Mr. V (t – c)   05:36, 5 November 2013 (UTC)


 * We need to deal with Neutral point of view this aspect before we go any further. If the editors can deal with the section that has been tagged with Neutral point of view then I will certainly endorse with for a GA. Nickelroy (talk) 18:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)